There seems to be two competing paradigms used to describe the causes of severe mental distress. \u00a0One takes a more objective scientific approach by focusing on an anatomical or biochemical imbalance of the brain. \u00a0The other takes a more social-spiritual approach by viewing mental distress as a developmental process in which the psyche is working to rebalance itself after facing traumatic or unfamiliar circumstances.<\/p>\n
I sought out Dr. Daniel Siegel<\/a> to interview because I admire his attempts to bridge the gap between science and spirituality from a neurobiological and clinical point of view. His goal is to bring together common principles from Anthropology, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, Psychiatry, Psychology and Sociology to further our understanding of mental health and mental distress. \u00a0Referring to his discipline as Interpersonal Neurobiology<\/a>, he stresses the importance of mindfulness training and healthy personal and community relationships on mental health and well-being. \u00a0His books<\/a>, Mindsight and Brainstorm, and his lectures have earned him a large following worldwide.<\/p>\n